This leaves us all in the moral
wilderness with no guidance, exactly where we should be. We can fall
back on the traditional morals which have guided us for so long and
served us relatively well... however in doing this we must recognize
we are doing so by choice. There are many “traditional” moral
codes and in following any given one of them you are choosing not to
follow all of the others. You have to answer the question, if only to
yourself, of why you have chosen any one over any other, just as you
would in choosing a “non-traditional” moral code. In this regard
the argument that “it is the morality of my fathers” is
insufficient. We must choose our moral course consciously and
rationally, and ultimately we will need to follow our deviate from
our supposed moral course consciously and rationally.
In every situation we choose the moral
code we wish to guide us because we believe it will bring us the
results we desire, and we choose how closely we will follow it in
every situation based on our desires, nothing more, nothing less. We
may say we do X because it is proscribed by our moral code, but we
can just as easily choose not to do X, and we can just as easily
choose another moral code which would not tell us to do X and then we
would still have to choose when faced with the choice whether or not
to do X... There are no answers, there are no rules, we are Free,
terribly and frighteningly Free.
Part of the social construction of
morality is the social establishment of reward and punishment for
“moral” and “immoral” actions. These rewards and punishments
are a replacement and reflection of the false promises made by
religion of reward and punishment in an afterlife. This is the source
of law, but even this structure does not save us from the terror of
choice because we always have to answer the question of whether our
fear of being caught and punished is sufficient to cause us to
conform. We also have the social responsibility to make the laws
which will govern us. In the modern age of democracy we are no longer
offered the false option of abdication of responsibility, false
because even such abdication to higher authority was itself choosing,
as it is to choose not to participate in the processes of
self-governing.
No comments:
Post a Comment